Categories
Politics

NO INTERNET ‘MONOPOLY’ IN CONDOS, SUBDIVISIONS

Makati City Representative Luis Campos Jr. warned condominium and subdivision developers against forming exclusive deals with a sole internet service provider (ISP), saying they risk getting slapped with administrative fines of up to P100 million.

“The law is very clear. These exclusionary arrangements with an in-house ISP are prohibited. They are unlawful barriers to the entry of competitors or other ISPs,” Campos said.

“We would urge residents or tenants adversely affected by their property developer’s exclusive contract with a single ISP to file complaints with the Enforcement Office of the Philippine Competition Commission (PCC),” the veteran legislator added.

“Exclusive transactions constitute unfair business practices that deprive consumers of the freedom to choose their preferred ISP.”

The lawmaker said exclusive transactions “also constitute unfair business practices that deprive consumers of the freedom to choose their preferred ISP.”

“In fact, one could make the argument that in forcing the residents or tenants to subscribe to a lone pre-determined ISP, there is price-fixing, because the consumer is in effect being barred from obtaining a similar service at another price,” he pointed out.

Campos has been batting for increased competition in the telecommunications market and greater public access to fast internet networks.

He has been pushing for the passage of House Bill 7479, which seeks to tag high-speed internet as “a basic telecommunications service to which every Filipino enjoys a right of access.”

Under the bill, the National Telecommunications Commission would be empowered to require ISPs to deliver rising average connection speeds within prescribed deadlines.

“We must remind all entities, including property developers, that they are forbidden from engaging in any conduct that would prevent, restrict or lessen competition.”

“We must remind all entities, including property developers, that they are forbidden from engaging in any conduct that would prevent, restrict or lessen competition,” Campos said.

Under the Philippine Competition Law, he said entities that take advantage of their dominant position to obstruct competition could face a fine of up to P100 million, depending on the gravity and duration of the offense.

In 2019, a mass housing developer was forced to settle an “abuse of dominance” violation with the PCC.

The developer acknowledged its misconduct in imposing a single ISP for nine of its projects across the country and was compelled to pay a fine of P27.11 million.

Last year, the PCC’s Enforcement Office also filed a separate case against a condominium developer for a similar offense.

Home

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *